pull down to refresh

300 sats \ 1 reply \ @kilianbuhn 23 Feb \ on: Question around developer privacy preservation devs
No, there is a big demand for this. Not only Bitcoin and adjacent projects. Even game emulators and piracy stuff.
Emulators might even be already a few years in the future of the kind of censorship that Bitcoin will eventually have. ๐ค
They already did transactions to Solana and Bitcoin with it ๐คฃ๐คฃ
Rolling it back just means that other people will loose their Eth shitcoins ๐๐
Y'all are gonna be so disappointed when DOGE and the new administration do "big moves" and nothing has an effect on anything in your life.
What about separate Olympics. One with and one without? Athletes can choose in which of the two they compete.
censorship ๐๐ป๐๐ป
edit: its not the government doing it so it's the companys freedom of speech to do so
Do you consider Bitcoin Core a wallet? Do you have these same concerns with core?
No because it's unrealistic.
But in theory yes it could have happened in the early days.
If you're in a position where you're entirely trusting the wallet publisher to stay operational and push updates, then you may as well be trusting a custodial service with your coin.
no? what kind of stupid coparison is this ๐คฃ๐คฃ. one can move to a different wallet + literally all other properties of Bitcoin
I've never understood this assumption that software needs to be constantly updated. Something works fine at one time, why change it?
because underlying OS APIs change and security holes will be found
there is no such thing in software as doing it once and keeping it forever. ๐
๐ปโโ๏ธ
ccc is a perfect example of leftists FOSS culture echo chamber
People here probably don't want to hear it but the original communities around Linux, Tor, PGP etc were also leftists
๐คท๐ปโโ๏ธ๐คท๐ปโโ๏ธ