pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @kilianbuhn OP 20h \ parent \ on: What's the role of transaction size in onchain privacy? bitcoin_beginners
I appreciate the effort. Am probably too poor for this setup π
Shouldn't this mean having never used an exchange with a wallet makes onchain Bitcoin way more private than its reputation?
You should always try to avoid KYC of any form for any transaction. However, Bitcoin's reputation for poor on chain privacy is generally accurate. Unless you take specific measures to control how your UTXOs are spent, you will casually link all of your transactions together over time.
But why tho? Never used an exchange with this wallet. Always VPN. Widely used wallet so not that uncommon type/version/locktime/feerate. Most transactions have odd sizes. Now what? Where is the attack surface on that wallet?
But this would probably take a lot of attempts when 100 people want to open a channel in the same coinjoin.
Do they? Why?
Coinjoins don't use lots of attempts either or do they?
There aren't enough people getting orangepilled or blockspace used enough to make this necessary yet.
But you ofc still do it now ππ
This makes me so furious.
There HAS TO BE so sort of constitutional right to challenge this in court. There is no way the british people actually want this.
Let's make it a tradition for UK people to travel to the US to buy hardware, set up accounts there and pretend to be "tourists to the uk" eternally
No, you also have to be the patriarch who's in charge.
If you can piss down on multiple layers below you - maybe you are. And if you're not you're being pissed on too.
Only those who would have a lower standing in a meritocracy than right now are the patriarchy
Well it's the best technology for mass download of data and not be obviously scraping everything.
So it's understandable.
On the other hand... don't they already have more data than almost everybody else?
if you work in a gas station in North Carolina or have a 9-5 office job in London you're not a "us patriarchy OGsβ π€£π€£
in short: privacy through coinjoins
in the future, i hope, almost all onchain transactions will be coinjoins
My personal conspiracy theory is that the 50/50 male/female ratio at birth is a big lie
It's more like 66/33.
The human species is naturally made for half of all males dying in war. They lie about it to not create unrest in the streets.
ok thanks π₯Ί
I didn't even know ln-urls have full invoices and expiration times in the background before you explained it to me recently
All the ATMs from one country will have more or less the same level of KYC.
If a Bitcoin ATM in Frankfurt, Germany needs phone number or bank transfer, you will not find a Bitcoin ATM in Berlin, Germany that's completely kyc free.
If a Bitcoin ATM in London, Britain requires complete full KYC with online account, you will not find a KYC free ATM in Bristol, Britain.
Different machines will have different KYC requirements. Find one that does not require any info
more like find a country than find a machine. ππ»ββοΈ
There are ATMs that claim to be KYC free but they really aren't because they want you to recieve an SMS with a security pin code to unlock the ATM. If they have your phone number, it's not kyc free.