I know. I’m arguing for your position. Assuming honesty should be our default. That doesn’t mean we should be naive and help people without discernment, however.

I also think you did right. Of course, if we know a person will use a gift for evil purposes or if we have reason to suspect bad faith, no one is obliged to give anything. Sometimes it might be the contrary. But I hardly think one can be at fault for taking something at face value. We’re educated and conditioned from our earliest years to think that what happens to others is of no consequence to us and that the things we have are all due to our own merits and that we can use them without any thought to the Laws of God

However the fix isn’t abandoning the only medicine against feminism. The thing is we need to first get rid of the idea that marriage is a contract we can just get out of it for whatever reason

It’s not only worth it, it’s just about the only thing still worthwhile in our current Godless society. However, it’s only fair that what is worth much, also costs much. But then, love without sacrifice was never love.

Of all those things, the changing table, in my experience is the least valuable. I change my kids just about anywhere now. It’s still useful. Baby bathtubs I also think are overrated. More useful when they’re newborns. You just need a good place to bathe them. In our house we’ve used our own showers, basins of all kinds, sinks and even buckets. Whatever works best for you.

Things I think are musts: they’re own crib and they’re own room (so they get used to sleeping alone and in their own environment), a breast feeding chair will grant you your partner’s eternal gratitude. And clothes and cloth diapers for drool, etc.

Being a pianist myself and knowing him, I feel bad for the man. Especially considering he has a baby girl now… that is so rough. I’m definitely praying for him…

The issue lies, I believe, in a flawed understanding of selflessness and sacrificial love on the part of the author. And maybe because she does depict them being in love and the you see what I think is a more likely situation: they wouldn’t necessarily be in love but more likely bonded by their trauma. Well, at the very least in the book.

It wouldn’t change much whether they were male or female as I see it, to answer another comment here

To sum it up, I think hunger games are the kinds of books that are fun, but fall into some of these excesses of sentimentality without which they could’ve been a pretty damn good

I only vote for exactness because I think in this case it would be better to ask the user if they were sure they wanted that extension and give them an option to never ask again and use the robustness approach after that

Yes, my friend. The issue is that I cannot receive in LN and I need to use my salary to live, and because I receive from a KYC source and live in a country that heavily controls all on and off ramps, I also need to do coinjoins, and I also have my savings in cold storage. Now, my salary is such that doing all this seems to me that it implies paying at least one 100ish dollar fee. Where I live and with my earnings that is simply not acceptable.

So yes, I'm forced to receive in fiat and buy it after the fact rather than spending a significant fraction of money just to get my money where I want it to be.

Yeah, I am aware of lightning and liquid and I'll have to make do for the time being somehow, but mentioning these things as though they magically fix all people's issues and use cases is really missing the point of the matter.

@om this answer's your question as well.

I honestly don’t see the point to all this. Right now, I’m being forced to receive my money in fiat again because of these fees since they effectively keep me from being able to distribute mu sats amongst my wallets. Pretty lame situation imo. I hope it just dies down sooner rather than later…

It is worth to remember though: yes, we can take bitcoins to heaven. But we can take them to hell too. The question is where we want to end up….

Regina Caeli, laetare Alleluia Quia quem meruisti portare Alleluia Resurrexit, sicut dixit Alleluia Ora pro nobis Deum Alleluia

I see. Well, in that case I do agree with the opinion that most share that privacy need not be solved on chain. At least not now. And if it does become a need, it can be implemented.

However, if L2 solutions to this become the norm, then problem solved.

Again, hard to make such decisions based on events that may not even happen when there is an easier path, development wise, that can achieve the same goals. And if it doesn't, attempting to implement on chain privacy is still something that can be done.

Think about it for a second: all this that we hear about bitcoin was said, to smaller or greater degree, about the internet when it came around. In the end, the internet has been used to impose the most strictest of government and social controls that were simply unheard of until now. Would you say it was a mistake to create it?

I'd say whatever we do can be misused. There isn't much sense in stopping to use something that is good because it may be used as a weapon.

While it is likely laws like these can get passed, it's also likely to exist countries that do the opposite. Not to mention that, in terms of resistance to KYC laws, bitcoin is leagues better than normal bank accounts.

I think this is likely. Worth noting that non kyc addresses and commerce will still exist for sure, but people just won't send non kyc bitcoin to kyc addresses and that is that.

On the other hand, things might not play out this way, depending on the incentives and general capabilities of law enforcement, but the possibility is real

Huh. That's actually a nice idea. I'll try that then. Thanks a lot!

I’ve not read these, but I throroughly recommend O Século do Nada, by Gustavo Corção. I’m pretty sure there’s an English translation. At the very least there’s a French one: Le siècle du néante

Because of the tinkering. In particular the work to make finding the right solution more efficient and also because you get closer to the hardware of the computer, which I find interesting.

Not to mention it connects you to the source of bitcoins. If ever I get but one sat from mining, I’d think that would be super cool