It actually makes sense. Trans people are probably the least mentally stable demographic in society. Allowing someone who's disturbed enough to want to surgically remove their sexual organs and/or inject themselves with hormones to own a gun is seemingly a danger to society

If you care about maintaining public safety and ensuring the survival of civilization, then you don't have the luxury of not judging groups collectively. It's a classic case of market failure, where liberty of a minority must be suspended for the collective good.

Not really, because bitcoiners for example, are adherents of the non aggression principle, which Muslims, collectively, are not. They bring violence with them wherever they go, particularly to advance their political agenda. This is historical fact.

Even though Islam isn't a religion, rather a subversive political movement, yes?

Props to the RGB team for making this a reality. This is a game changer and will be huge for asset issuance on Bitcoin/Lightning. Can't wait to use this - so many possibilities

Can you please ELI5?

Who are they in debt to? That's the question

Good point but I still don't get how they would use oil and not some oil derivative? Heating, hot water etc. is done with diesel/gas/electricity. Not oil. No?

How is oil used for energy/electricity? I get coal and gas, but doesn't oil need to be refined into something else to become useful for energy production? And what's the difference really between energy and electricity?

Syria's population is ~25 million, of which 2-3 million are Alawites. In hindsight it's clear that such a minority exerting rule violently over a much larger population wasn't sustainable

Beyond the fact that Bitcoin is used a store of value, the 'digital gold' narrative is flawed. Bitcoin (similarly to fiat) has no intrinsic value but derives its value from the people who hold and believe in it. It isn't useful without a network effect.

Money and thus bitcoin should be viewed as political activism. Politics in the sense of 'affairs of the cities' i.e. the public sphere.

Historically, rulers minted their own coins bearing their name and image when they came to power. Why? Because that was an expression of their authority. We're entering a post-imperial world in which the hegemon is the private individual. Bitcoin is valuable because it's an expression of that political power, whereas gold is valuable without any political application

How much we talking about?

Thanks. Looking into those options 👍👍 What's the "splicing feature" on one leg?

Checking out coinos.io. thanks!

Thanks. Submarine swaps seem interesting (I saw Alex bosworth post about it a couple of years back and it intrigued me but never delved into it). Looking forward to learning more...

Shoutout to @supertestnet who introduced me to LNbits. Been intrigued by the project ever since