pull down to refresh
@softglitter2d
169,873 sats stacked
stacking since: #12393longest cowboy streak: 56npub1pps3g...rjhsnz4je6
7 sats \ 1 reply \ @softglitter2d OP 5 Jun \ parent \ on: Need to start over my publications AskSN
Which one are you using sir?
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @softglitter2d OP 5 Jun \ parent \ on: Need to start over my publications AskSN
I had bad experience with github pages, so now I'm using this resource to simply do experiments. Although is not a bad idea to return to that.
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @softglitter2d OP 5 Jun \ parent \ on: Need to start over my publications AskSN
NFA stands for non-financial advice
My favorite part of the morning is start reading @super_testnet's posts about Monero. You realize people who use it don't even understand about their own currency.
See for yourself https://x.com/SuperTestnet/status/1930454570968203309
Tokenization, as we know it today, has more of a legal utility within our system.
At the international level, the law recognizes three types of tokens: a token (like a casino chip), which has a specific use; a token (like a bank PIN), which serves as an access credential; and tokens that hold economic value, which are referred to as digital assets.
Regarding the example mentioned, the OP has a point—tokenization today primarily serves to guarantee the immutability of a contract or object in the real world, preventing duplication of the object to be audited or verified. However, returning to the main point, these objects must be backed by a legal contract to facilitate legal processes.
I’m not against tokenization, but I don’t see much usability today unless the legal frameworks are adapted to support its use.
✅ Set clear rules: “If a house drops to 1 BTC or less, I’ll buy (sell BTC).”
This is a good advice, most people still saving in bitcoin but purchasing with fiat mentality. It's easier to rebrand our thinking to spend less and save more with this. Good one sir.
The personal filter works everytime I go to a library. This is how I work:
Step 1: Beginning the year, I come with four types of lectures I want to pursue:
- something I already know (say bitcoin or politics),
- something I know I don't know (say bitcoin programming or financial politics),
- something I don't know at all (physics, soft skills, etc)
- something for fun (last year I started to read sci-fi)
Step 2: The book I'll choose must fall into those categories and most important is to look my bookshelf and see if I'm currently reading something of that matter. For instance, say I found Bitcoin Standard by Saif but I'm currently reading Knut's books; my goal is to first finish what I started and then proceed to buy the next one. otherwise, I'll turn into a book buyer without any meaning.
Step 3: Is it worth? I mean, do you really need the book now? Can you wait more to buy it?
In that way, I pursue myself to not only buy book but also finish it.
And it’s not difficult to run a node
RIGHT? It's easier than people think. And when you start making tests with the scripts, you feel the power. Create a raw transaction for yourself, you feel the energy itself.
Your wants are aligned with the block demand and the current supply. Bitcoin gives you the chance to work honestly, broadcast a transaction, earn sats and help to improve the hashrate, giving us non-miners more security.
But question: how many Bitaxes do you consider enough to start making a difference? Meaning from an experiment to something serious.