pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @theonevortex 20 Dec \ parent \ on: Covenant support comparison by Vortex bitcoin
Hard to believe you there but appreciate the sentiment anyway so I sent some sats.
As I mentioned the client will be ready next year, I'm simply correcting you on all of your lies, fud and misinformation.
LNhance needs millisats
Millisats has literally nothing to do with scaling, slicing up units into smaller units does not help scale anything and to think otherwise would show you have no clue about what you're talking about
moon an rearden are scammers
They're literally just open source devs donating their time freely while still having full time jobs, they are not scamming anyone. Nodes of course will decide what gets activated.
who's lying now? this is your quote "Not your UTXO not your coin, that's an immutable fact of Bitcoin... Shared UTXO aren't a thing, you don't own the coin unless you can receive a full UTXO." This is incorrect as I just pointed out.
Nobody is working on a supply cap increase, they're working on actual useful features plus Millisats already exists in LN.
Now prove to me why LNhance is a scam like you claim it is.
So moving the goal posts? First you can't unilaterally exit, then when I tell you that it's possible you come up with another issue?
UTXO sharing is for far more use cases than just scaling custody and LNhance provides far more features than just UTXO sharing. Yet again you haven't a clue because you've read nothing and did zero research.
not your utxo not your coin
100% false yet again. As long as you have your private key you can unilaterally exit the UTXO at anytime and no one else can spend your coin without your private key.
It's just presigned transactions bro, maybe do some actual reading on utxos.org/uses or read the CTV BIP so you can understand how utxo sharing actually works?
utxo sharing is a hoax
This is provably false, there are examples of covenant txs on testnet using CTV and CAT.
Millisats would let you self custody a single sat trustlessly
Do you actually think utxo sharing is the same as increasing supply cap, are you serious? It's literally nothing more than just presigned transactions...you realize this right?
UTXO sharing is for many people beyond just farmers, there are billions of people in the world like wtaf are you focused on farmers for?
Covenants provide ability to do cold/non-interactive channels. I want this, ln-symmetry and vaults, I don't want to increase the supply cap since I'm not an idiot and understand that does nothing to help scaling.
Wow you are going off on an extremely ridiculous tangent. Obviously creating new units doesn't solve any kind of scaling issue whatsoever.
Is this your rebuttal to me telling you LNhance is not a scam? Asking me if I would support increasing the supply cap? Of course not, supply cap will never be raised wtf are you even talking about.
And I've explained how you're wrong and you literally couldn't even rebuttal yet still think you're right, so I guess you are indeed a hopeless case. Best of luck spammer.
So you can't make a legitimate rebuttal because you don't know how or because you lack the information to do so?
So literally no rebuttal at all then? Just trying to tell me I'm using the word objectively incorrectly when I'm clearly not? Do you see how clownish you look?
You literally weren't correct on a single point and have no ability to tell anyone why you think you are without using profanity.
then shill APO
APO alone is objectively not nearly as efficient costing many more bytes and is more complex than something like CTV + CSFS which are 2 op codes in LNhance.
vaults are garbage
100% objectively false and "garage" is not a technical argument against them
channel factories are fake
100% objectively false, you can read more about these features on utxos.org/uses
Once again you're objectively wrong on everything.
100% objectively false.
You get vaults better than MuSig, ln-symmetry, channel factories, non-interactive channels, payment pools and more efficient transactions just to name a few features.
Simple.
People like you prove you have no idea what they're talking about over and over again by being objectively incorrect about technical features and replying with nothing but profanity.
It's not about what I think though, it's about objectively what does LNhance do for bitcoin, so far you haven't proved you understand what it does, let alone how it's a scam.
it's not though and you haven't offered any legitimate proof that it is and your memes make you look even more insane
lol keep on with the profanity, you don't sound insane at all, and you still never even gave a single legitimate reason as to how LNhance is a scam
You can absolutely presign a tx offline before then broadcasting it later online, this is basic 101 stuff, and you're the one confused if you think LNhance is a layer 2 or an altcoin.
Read more.
I literally quoted your insult of a thread with zero technical argument and showed how it makes no sense but ok