Happy Sat-urday Stackers,
Have a great weekend!
Top PostsTop Posts
- Tether Fun Unbelievable Details - Part I
- I dropped Cashu e-cash nuts in the saloon for 365 days. Here is what I learned
- @BlokchainB concludes and reflects on his 365 day experiment giving away Cashu e-cash nuts intended to familiarize himself with the Cashu ecosystem.
- 2.7k sats \ 30 comments \ @BlokchainB
- #1039446
- @conduition triggers a compliance false positive when using PayWithMoon.com and was shotgun KYC'd.
- 3.6k sats \ 14 comments \ @conduition
- The Introductory Econ Reading List
- @Undisciplined shares a list of economics books, intended to be read in order, after @Aardvark asked for recommendations.
- 3.1k sats \ 19 comments \ @Undisciplined
- Will Gen Z Realize Its Future Runs on Fossil Fuels? (TDE, Alex Rosado)
- @denlillaapan agrees with Rosado's point but is disappointed in how it was argued.
- 921 sats \ 22 comments \ @denlillaapan
Top AMAsTop AMAs
Don't missDon't miss
- Saylor's Latest Strategy: Raising Funds to Pay Dividends
- SuperTestnet Monero vs Lightning debate @ Friday the 18th at 1800 UTC
- When is freedom bad?
- What great advice do you give that you yourself don't follow?
- Are you an NPC?
- Why Did Bitcoin Jump in Recent Days? (Checkonchain, James Check)
- What better time to release than during bitcoin ATH 😉🚀 Alby Hub v1.18 is here
- A Gold Treasury Company? Yes, Yes Of Course (Bloomberg, Matt Levine)
- Bitcoin STANDARD Treasury Company (Bloomberg Money Stuff, Matt Levine)
- Quantum Computing Followup
- The Age of Fiscal Excess (Financial Times, Editorial)
- liquiditystr LSP hacked
Top metaTop meta
- COMING SOON: Stacker News Fiction Month (with a 200k sats prize fund)
- What makes a Stacker?
- Stacker News Helper for Hacker News - Chrome Web Store
- SN release: wallets v2
- How to Write an Article People Will Read Until the End
- SNZ issue #17 ~ v i b e c h e c k ~
- tuesday territory meta reflection
- WORD-OF-MOUTH WEDNESDAY - WIN 10K SATS!
- SN post-release: wallets v2
- What are you working on this week?
- Current state of the AGORA: P2P Bitcoin-only Marketplace within SN
Top Monday memeTop Monday meme
Top StackersTop Stackers
- @dr_orlovsky: 114.5k sats stacked
- @Scoresby: 87.5k sats stacked
- @Undisciplined: 79.2k sats stacked
- @grayruby: 72.7k sats stacked
- @optimism: 42.8k sats stacked
Top SpendersTop Spenders
- @dr_orlovsky: 121.6k sats spent
- @Scoresby: 96.9k sats spent
- @unschooled: 63k sats spent
- @Aardvark: 57.2k sats spent
- @TNStacker: 54.9k sats spent
Top CowboysTop Cowboys
- @Undisciplined: 662 days
- @BlokchainB: 641 days
- @grayruby: 605 days
- @Coinsreporter: 443 days
- @Public_N_M_E: 390 days
Top BoostsTop Boosts
- RGB consensus layer released to production
- We are BitBox, makers of the open source BitBox02 - AMA!
- Hi, Terence Michael () Bitcoiner. Hollywood. Real Estate. Author.
- Nostr Developer Survey
- ZapTracker - NWC Grant participant
Yeehaw, Keyan A guy who works on Stacker News
Watch or Listen to SN's top stories every week.
Get this newsletter sent to your email inbox by signing up here.
Ever since reviving ~ai I've bumped up 3-4 places in the top stacker list, but this seems to be mostly due to territory rewards? In fact, I feel that the main contributor my "top stacker" status comes from being active and getting rewards for activity rather than for great content; after all, I often rank higher than @denlillaapan, who provides more and higher quality content than I do, and gets more upzaps - the discrepancy between top-stackers-by-value vs top-stackers-by-stacking seems large at times.
Does it make sense to have a ranking that ignores rewards and territory income / expense? Just checking what y'all think.
I thought it was all just sats revenue...?
I guess the question that I'm asking is: are rewards really "revenue"? Maybe I should formulate my question better.
Yea....?
How do you mean that they're not?
I think that the rewards skew it a bit, because of the distribution mechanism (and the daily 50k sats subsidy.) On top, as I said, I'm not sure if territory revenue should be counted under stacking revenue, as this is - at least how I see it - a distinct money flow.
So I turn up in "top stackers" now not because of the content I contribute, but because of the sats I receive to make up for what I spend on maintaining territory. To me, this makes it feel as if the top stackers list isn't apples-to-apples, after all, you can't run sports or bitcoin or asksn, because those are monopolized.
Also since the top stackers' list includes rewards, if I were posting a lot of half-great content on Monday when there was a big boost, but you were posting a lot of really-great content on Tuesday when there wasn't, then I will, despite stacking less than you on my actual content, have a very good chance to be ranked above you.
Therefore something feels off, but I guess I should just not be lazy and read the code.
Hm... So you mean territory fee propels you higher, or "passive" income from unrelated zaps in your territory increases your rank?
The former.
Wooo this has got to be a record on lateness.
That's pretty good, considering it's still Saturday.
No one is ever thirsty around you. The glasses are always half full.
I don't know how I still made the top stackers list. I was hardly on SN this week.
Step it up guys.
Wow @OneOneSeven dropped out the cowboy race
'The Rise of the Cowboys' or 'The Fall of the Cowboys' which is a better title?
"Fall" is more realistic