pull down to refresh

Memories Of Zuccotti Park

I was organizing old photos the other night when I came across a few which I took while visiting Zuccotti Park almost exactly 14 years ago. It was right at the end of the “Occupy Wall Street” protests. I was working in lower Manhattan that day, so I spent some time roaming around the site. Excuse the poor resolution. I was probably using some early Motorola android phone to take them. To put things in context, this was a few years after the news headline that inspired Satoshi’s genesis block inscription:
It was pretty sad. The space itself was much smaller than what I expected from watching the protests on television. It was a cold, rainy, November day. Most of the crowd had makeshift rain ponchos. A few of them were willing to talk. It was a far cry from the well funded, performative and destructive productions we have gotten used to watching from Soros, Inc. The protesters all stood inside the cage erected around the park by the NYPD. There were some handwritten signs and some chants complaining about the bailouts. I noticed a few old gray ponytailed hippies trying to distribute their socialist pamphlets, but from the accents I could tell that most of these people were local New Yorkers. Many had lost their homes to foreclosure recently. They couldn’t comprehend why they didn’t get a bailout along with the banks. It was a polite, pathetic little scene. They were like zoo animals in their cages.
Zuccotti Park wasn’t originally chosen as the site for the protests. The police herded people there so that Wall Street’s business could continue uninterrupted. Soon though, the park was embraced by the movement because of its location, its legal status, and its historical significance.
First of all, it was a POPS, a privately owned public space. The property owner is required by local zoning laws to keep it open to the public. These spaces are maintained by owners who were granted concessions by the municipality, like height restriction wavers and property tax breaks- the perfect product of crony capitalism. It is quasi private, kind of like the way the Federal Reserve is often described. Because it is a public space, no one could be accused of trespassing, and the park never closed. People began sleeping there overnight.
United States Steel originally built the park, then called Liberty Plaza Park, in exchange for the rights to demolish older buildings and erect a fifty four story skyscraper nearby. The name was changed after the park was heavily damaged in the September 11 attacks.
At the time of the protests, Zuccotti Park was owned by Brookflield Properties. Thanks to the TARP Program, Brookfield recovered quickly from the financial crisis and was soon thriving, enjoying those near zero percent interest rates that continued all the way to 2015.
The (soon to be former) homeowners I saw wearing ponchos that day didn’t have a spot at the Cantillon trough.

The Site’s Historical Significance

Zuccotti Park is the site of the first coffeehouse to open in Colonial America. It was called The King’s Arms, and opened in 1696. On November 5, 1773, the Sons Of Liberty organized a large protest of the Tea Act in front of the coffeehouse. This may have been the first public protest of the tax. Months later New York had its own small tea party.

Larry Fink

Larry Fink and BlackRock spearheaded the bailouts that Satoshi memorialized and these people were protesting against.
Before forming BlackRock, Fink had traded mortgage backed securities (MBS) at First Boston. Some of these products were the toxic assets that were a catalyst of the financial crisis. Who better than him to solve the problem? BlackRock was hired by the U.S. government to analyze and manage the bailout of major financial institutions- the fox guarding the hen house. By this point Fink was the ultimate political and financial insider. Larry did express sympathy for the poor suckers who actually had to suffer while he and his buddies grew richer:
"We have to admit, as members of the financial press and the financial community…Washington…we really did let down a lot of people… To resolve this we have to admit it."
What did he do to resolve it? Nothing. Instead, BlackRock’s power grew. When Hillary Clinton ran as the democratic nominee against Donald Trump in 2016, Larry Fink was expected to be named Treasury Secretary if she had won the election.
Remember covid? Remember how the entire economy shut down, except for those the government decided could keep operating? Guess who advised the federal reserve on their asset buying program? Yep. Larry and BlackRock.
Billionaire investor Sam Zell once said "I didn't know Larry Fink had been made God…"
Today, BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager. They manage funds for companies, pension funds, and governments. It is the largest shareholder in many S&P 500 companies. It advises central banks throughout the world.
Larry once called bitcoin "the domain of money launderers and thieves." Now he likes it. In fact, he likes it so much that BlackRock’s bitcoin ETF is the largest bitcoin ETF, by far.

Welcome To The Machine

Many of us in the bitcoin community have embraced these ETFs. It’s a real hassle having to custody your own bitcoin. Coinbase is reputable. We’re sure they have the bitcoin they say they have. This is what adoption looks like.
Many of us in the community have no problem with bitcoin treasury companies either. Like Saylor says, who needs those crazy anarchist cypherpunks and their “hold your own keys” stuff? Embracing Wall Street, with its futures contracts,options, margin loans and derivatives is what adoption looks like.
Many of us in the bitcoin community have no problem begging the US government to embrace bitcoin. We can trust the government, right? This is what adoption looks like. We can trust Trump, right? What’s a few shitcoin rugpulls among friends? This is what adoption looks like.
Bullshit.
You want Larry in charge? Four D chess? Don't underestimate the guy sitting across the table from you. The Trojan Horse? Remember, that was myth, not history.
Bitcoin will survive and thrive, but that’s not the point. Why embrace the system that bitcoin was created to destroy? Start using it as money, not as a plaything for financiers. Help build a new system from the ground up. Don't worry about Larry. He still has those eth ETFs. He'll survive too.
You’re making me worry that we’re going to be marginalized like people who insist on using cash.
reply
105 sats \ 5 replies \ @optimism 2h
Isn't that what we're coming from though?
reply
Elaborate
reply
207 sats \ 3 replies \ @optimism 2h
At no point in time, unless you're in one of a few very specific communities (that are on the margins themselves), has Bitcoin been accepted as a norm. It has always been worked against from the moment it came on the normies' radar. From insane licensing requirements in NY, through the IRS taxing the hell out of any value retained (and only gained against the ever inflating fiat crap they print) to the hopefully now-ending era where middlemen and ponzinomics thrive through cronyism, has there not been anything encouraging or even enabling Bitcoin as an MoE. The only time it wasn't frowned upon was when there was no adoption at all and it was on no one's radar.
This doesn't mean that there's defeat, to the contrary. If politicians/bankers/scammers are looking to marginalize for-purpose Bitcoin-as-MoE and only promote it as some virtual asset you can buy but never sell because of the insane taxation, broker fees, and so on, then that's fine for them, but we're used to operating in the margins. Because that's where we started, and we've not grown out of that anyway. If normies just want to accept the ETFs and the Saylor scams, then that is their loss.
reply
Ok, I agree with that.
It undermines my dream of bitcoin upending the entire system, though.
reply
105 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 1h
What isn't there, can yet be to come. If fiat is unsustainable, then it is inevitable that it ends. We don't need to take on the task of ending it directly; what is needed regardless of a total breakdown of the system is a healthy parallel ecosystem. Have an alternative so that no one needs to be left behind.
Therefore we build.
reply
Again we’re in agreement. It’s good to splash cold water on your own utopian dreams from time to time.
reply
Yes. I can't help thinking it will happen.
reply
36 sats \ 3 replies \ @optimism 3h
Coinbase is reputable. We’re sure they have the bitcoin they say they have.
Since when? Just because they say and maintain an image that they are, doesn't mean they actually are or even if, will stay reputable.
reply
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 OP 3h
Sarcasm😀 I hope I made that clear. Now I'm worried.
reply
36 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 2h
I wasn't sure. haha.
Ultimately it doesn't matter if they have the coin they claim to have though, as long as you're not holding their IOUs. Yes, I am telling everyone to not hold their IOUs!
Ultimately Bitcoin recently survived FTX' paper Bitcoin just fine so the protocol and the network will be fine. The question is: will you be fine?
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 2h
That is the question
reply
111 sats \ 4 replies \ @OT 2h
  • like
Thought this was an anti Knots post
reply
121 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 OP 2h
AHAHA! I'm so pissed I missed that typo in the title! Or, maybe I really meant to do it?
reply
36 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 2h
errors like this makes us human in the ocean of shitGPT posts...
reply
Thanks, but it is frustrating!
reply
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 2h
Autocorrect gets me all the time too. But not in the title (yet!)
reply
Bitcoin subculture is as significant as its moneyness.
Did Hip-hop, punk, heavy metal 'Trojan horse' popular music culture? Or did they just get subsumed, shackled, as it were?
Did the Beat Generation 'Trojan horse' popular media? Or did they all drink themselves to death or otherwise sell out?
I guess your answer to these questions are indicative of where you think Bitcoin subculture is headed.
Cronyism might be par for the course if we accept it as money, while, at the same time being uncceptable to the subversive ethos that brought it to be.
reply
110 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 2h
You summed it up perfectly
reply
I'm right with you here.
I think the only difference between us and those other mentioned subcultures is we have, for better or worse, the privilege of knowing what came of them.
....oh and freedom-tech
reply
144 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 2h
Some good reminders here. I suspect that SN as a group of bitcoiners is probably least likely to be holding ETF shares and believing in 4D chess, yet complacency does slip up on us if we aren't careful.
There is something a little crazy about the people who really want to use bitcoin as money. I'm glad for that crazy, and I think the frustration I sense in your post here is that a lot of bitcoin culture feels like it's getting a little too normal, forgetting its craziness. We've undertaken this enterprise of resisting the state with no promise of success. But it feels like a lot of people are clutching false promises because they're afraid BItcoin will fail.
Thanks for reminding me that I need to go find somewhere to spend a few sats today.
reply
Exactly. It's a tough situation. Everyone wants to provide for themselves and their family. I understand those OG sellers over the last year. I think a lot of this "this is what adoption looks like" crap is bitcoiners justifying their own desire for fiat wealth.
reply
Start using it as money, not as a plaything for financiers. Help build a new system from the ground up. Don't worry about Larry.
This is the next stage Bitcoin has to reach if we want it to really take off worldwide. We’ve gotta put in some extra effort to get the Lightning Network on the map for real, more than it already is.
BlackRock: Bitcoin Clients Focus on 'Digital Gold,' Not Payments #1289470
reply
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 1h
Bitcoin will survive and thrive, but that’s not the point. Why embrace the system that bitcoin was created to destroy? Start using it as money, not as a plaything for financiers. Help build a new system from the ground up. Don't worry about Larry. He still has those eth ETFs. He'll survive too.
Yes!
reply