Million Sat Madness Leaderboard — #835081 \ stacker news ~oracle

Million Sat Madness Leaderboard — #835081

929 sats \ 98 comments \ @0xbitcoiner 17 Mar oracle

I'm sure many of us are curious to know who will be on the podium. I'm sure @siggy47 is one of them, and he definitely deserves a spot. But who else do you think might be up there ?

view all related items

295 sats \ 3 replies \ @TheWildHustle 17 Mar

TheWildHustle is hanging in at the 49 spot. A couple of well placed memes and zaps should secure the freaks bag.

50 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 17 Mar

You should be on an upper position IMHO.

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheWildHustle 17 Mar

50 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

102 sats \ 0 replies \ @DesertDave 17 Mar

@thebitcoinbugle is coming up for sure. They are relentless over there.

32 sats \ 40 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar

Best guess:

k00b siggy kr darth david undisciplined you me scoresby ek

50 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

If sn makes it to the leaderboard, it completely changes my perspective. If they enter, I'm forced to agree with your guess.

20 sats \ 38 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 17 Mar

I think k00b, ek, kr, sn are excluded

0 sats \ 37 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar

I know they are excluded from winning sats but are they excluded from the leaderboard? Who could possibly have an estimated over 1M sats besides k00b?

Even if it is siggy. Then who are 2 and 3.

43 sats \ 3 replies \ @Scoresby 17 Mar

I think you are right, but I would point out that whoever is in first place by definition has an estimated over 1M sat earning.

I take the estimated earnings to merely be a reflection of that rank's share of the total prize pool. It only reflects one's engagement insofar as engagement plays a role in rank.

If SN affiliated accounts don't show up on the leaderboard, then yes, there is at least one dark horse who must be a serious badass at zapping...

If you look at top posts by week or month, there aren't any unaccounted for names besides the ones already mentioned.

There are a two other people I can think of who are in hiding and who might be in the top 10, but I'm still a little puzzled.

50 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

I can only see two people who could be on the leaderboard. There are 3 missing and I definitely can't guess who they are. This is much more fun this way. AHAhahaha

32 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar

Very interesting.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 17 Mar

I think that's basically correct, but I wonder how they're excluding themselves.

One option is to just slide everyone up the rankings as you describe.

It would be more complicated if their posts, comments, and zaps are excluded. That would change where we all rank on each of the separate score components and could potentially change our rankings with respect to each other.

20 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

#468700 👀

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar

Wow. @Undisciplined

20 sats \ 30 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 17 Mar

I assumed they were excluded from the leaderboard too, but I’m not certain.

The top stacker has over 1M sats because the top stacker gets 1M by being number 1, in addition to the other rewards. It’s not because the top stacker is in that much of a lead over the rest.

100 sats \ 27 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar

Ok fair enough. Maybe I am wrong but besides Siggy I can't figure out who it could be that I don't see listed below. Maybe scoresby but then who is in 9 and 10? Carlos?

Fun exercise.

50 sats \ 25 replies \ @carlosfandango 17 Mar

Carlos?

I’m not not posting anything this month as I don’t agree with it. Comment only - therefore i cant realistically be in the running.

20 sats \ 24 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar

Ok. Was just trying to identify prominent stackers who aren't visible but I guess you are out of the running.

632 sats \ 23 replies \ @carlosfandango 17 Mar

I’m putting my sats on Natalia…

view replies

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 17 Mar

Definitely a mind bender!

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 18 Mar

Yes, we are excluded from the leaderboard

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

#468700 👀

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 17 Mar

I think you and I have been swapping back and forth for a few days.

23 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

I agree, but maybe not because I decided last week that I would only watch on Sundays. To be more specific, I will watch every day, but since I am hidden, I am not sure if it is me.

16 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 17 Mar

since I am hidden, I am not sure if it is me

Indeed. I'm never sure if it's you either, but at this point I don't think people are jumping around a lot in the top 10.

16 sats \ 2 replies \ @Fabs 17 Mar

I could be up there among the stars, but I am too lazy.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

It's quite possible that you're in the top 10 because there are quite a few after you that are not hidden (11-37).

16 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 17 Mar

Nah, I am far from it, and I won't make it 😵

21 sats \ 5 replies \ @030e0dca83 17 Mar

@DarthCoin as SN teacher #1 should be in top3

29 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 17 Mar

NO I do not deserve that. Are many others better than me. I keep that position strong between #4 and #10 so shitcoiners can't take it :) But I am willing to give it for somebody else.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

It has crossed my mind to donate the remaining 100k to some landowners. I will definitely think about it more, and I will make a decision next Sunday.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @030e0dca83 17 Mar

Only zaps will decide who deserves and who not

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 17 Mar

Is kinda flawed anyways... many discrepancies I see. #468380

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @030e0dca83 17 Mar

stackerNews evolves on its flaws and imperfections

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @BitcoinIsTheFuture 17 Mar

It’s been an interesting contest. Let’s see how the rest of the month ends up. It will be interesting to see this impact on SN website usage.

10 sats \ 5 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

Do you think so? People are running low on sats! Hahaha

16 sats \ 4 replies \ @BitcoinIsTheFuture 17 Mar

Um What sats lol

10 sats \ 3 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @BitcoinIsTheFuture 17 Mar

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

You mean they are incredibly cheap ?

16 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitcoinIsTheFuture 17 Mar

We are making them rain! The sat storm is coming through!

0 sats \ 30 replies \ @Coinsreporter 17 Mar

Three of @Scoresby, @siggy47, @sn, @kr, @k00b, and @ek are definitely among the top three.

69 sats \ 29 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

Accounts related to the SN team are excluded for obvious reasons.

21 sats \ 23 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar

Excluded from winning the sats. They never said they were excluded from the leaderboard. k00b and kr definitely have to be in top 3. Besides siggy no other power user makes any sense.

50 sats \ 21 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

Fair enough. I had assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that they would not appear on the leaderboard. Here's a good question for @sn to clarify.

53 sats \ 14 replies \ @sn 17 Mar

the SN team is excluded from the million sat madness leaderboard too

37 sats \ 13 replies \ @Coinsreporter 17 Mar

Alright so that brings down the list to @siggy47, @Scoresby and @0xbitcoiner. They must be in the top 3 positions.

11 sats \ 4 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

20 sats \ 3 replies \ @Coinsreporter 17 Mar

I still can't believe it! 😲😲 Any guesses for the third name considering we agree on two?

view replies

1 sat \ 7 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar

Siggy for sure and I think scoresby must be up there too. 0x went public a few days ago and was lower in the top 10. I think 0x is 6 right now.

50 sats \ 5 replies \ @Scoresby 17 Mar

I'm almost certain I'm not top three. Not unless a lot changed since I checked a week ago.

view replies

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 17 Mar

What's your best guess for the third name in top three?

reply on another page

50 sats \ 5 replies \ @Coinsreporter 17 Mar

Okay fine😴! It's 1 AM here and I've been busy trying to find for the third stacker who is hiding his face. But my spy eyes have caught @TonyGiorgio

Now we have all top three or at least we have top 6 or may be we have top 10 minus three still hiding somewhere.

50 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

🤔 😂

58 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 17 Mar

No I am serious. @TonyGiorgio has done a lot to take that prestigious spot.

20 sats \ 2 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 17 Mar

I'm nowhere near the top, I haven't been very active at all for the last few months.

20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Coinsreporter 17 Mar

Oops! Please check it once again. It's not about last few months, it's about this month only. But, I didn't find your name in the list so just 🤔..I can't believe it.

31 sats \ 0 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 17 Mar

I turned off my hidden status temporarily and I'm at the very bottom. I'll get less sats this month than many days I've had rewards previously.

Just the way she goes 🤷‍♂️

reply on another page

50 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 17 Mar

Yes, it took me so long to write because I was trying to search if they declared anything about their exclusion from winning. @Scoresby is a tough competitor. You can see his engagement in the top post by applying weekly/monthly filter.

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Coinsreporter 17 Mar

Alright, here comes my next speculation Edit: can't find the third one.

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

This is so funny :)

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Coinsreporter 17 Mar

Seriously, I can't think of third one. Whoever I pick, I find it on the list sitting way below. Can you guess one or two names, just randomly.

1 sat \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

psacramento wrote a huge post. So huge, I doubt anyone has read it all :)

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 17 Mar

For that reason I selected him but he didn't make it. Maybe all because he lacked the generosity of zapping others.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DesertDave 17 Mar

What is this. We can be leaders??

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

#445297 👀