pull down to refresh

When I was a child growing up in India, I learned that “might makes right.” Power was often abused, with those in control acting as if they had a God-given right to exploit and dominate others. The display of authority could be so extreme that questioning it or expecting those in power to do their duty might lead to retribution. Those in authority seemed to believe that their positions were not for serving others but for personal gain.
People who showed respect appeared to have meekly accepted a lower, subservient position. Kind people had to hide their compassion, for being nice was seen as a weakness.
In India, I have rarely seen someone in authority take the initiative to solve a problem he was responsible for. When I was at university, an underaged boy who worked in the kitchen was raped and sodomized by the janitors. I reported the matter, but not only did no one in authority do what was right — something well within their power — the authorities and fellow students threatened me with severe consequences if I pursued the matter further. Devoid of empathy, they also made fun of the boy and me.
This will make some people very angry, but I found this to be true during my travels in India. The reason it causes bad feelz in some people is that it is true, at least in my experience.
i don't understand, from any perspective, what the motive would be to protect a rapist janitor. like ok, if the head of the university did it, you could argue it was the age of story of 'protecting those in power' but a lowly janitor?
reply
It's to avoid any kind of public relations disaster. Even if the authorities punished the lowly janitor, it still makes them look bad for hiring him in the first place, and/or creating a culture where something like this could happen. That's why schools go out of their way to cover up bad behavior by teachers, even if the individual teacher is a nobody
reply
It is also to avoid contretemps from the prosecution of a man for a crime against a woman. Where was Shiva’s lingam in all of this?
reply
i mean ok, but at least cover up and then fire him so he cant do any more raping
reply
Why? They stone to death or beat to death offending Christian and Muslims. Couldn’t they give the same treatment to a rapist?
reply
India is far from perfect but I am tempted to say they didn't create concentration camps like Germans and didn't play with atomic bombs like Americans. I am not sure also leaving India for a country where they forced injections (Canada) and impose socialist doctrines is a good choice.
That being said, in my opinion the biggest problem of India are roads. If only they could add roundabouts/traffic signals, I think quality of life would improve vastly.
reply
India is ruled by Fabians, so why worry about lefty/Marxist/socialist/communist/murderers.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @john_doe 2h
I have never been in political circles in India, so I concede you this one if you did or know better. Still, I don't judge Americans based on Biden, just what as a society everyone does. I see there is more freedom than in Japan in many respect, nobody or very few people wear masks, traditional medicine is very present, you can get non chemical food, boxing in India is quite good, very good service, etc. The list of positive things about India is quite long. Inversely, last time I went back to Japan, everyone were wearing masks, food became worse, service was frankly bad in some places. They don't even give you plastic bags when you obviously need one now in Japan, you have to ask (who is not afraid of global warming). By the way I have never lived in North India, only the South, so I can't judge the North. So if your judgement is based on the North I concede you could be right as well.
reply
The most south that I got was Mysore. I spent time in Rajastan and across northern India. I spent some time in Panaji in Goa on the beaches. I went everywhere by slow trains and local busses. I wanted to go to Tamil Nadu but the heat was getting too oppressive for me.
reply
This will make some people very angry, but I found this to be true during my travels in India.
I'm from India and I'm not angry. I'd say it's just the writer's personal opinion which only sees the glass empty. From the starting till the end of this lengthy article the positive remarks were about his own family which shows the writer's solipsism. I just can't agree with everything he said there. I'd love to know how did you experience all the things that the writer mentioned about india to be true during your short (I assume) visits here?
reply
I guess you assumed wrong. I was there about 1.5 years in India, itself. I was also in Nepal, Pakistan and very short time Sikkim. I walked to the four country border near Darjeeling. I went to a Dharmsala and studied Vipassna meditation for a month.
reply
1.5 years is still a very short period to say that everything the writer said about India was true.
India is a complex country in many ways and because you've stayed here you should know it. Just tell me do you agree everything that he said there?
reply
No, I don’t agree with everything. I saw a lot of it with my own eyes, though.
reply
That's okay now. It would've been better, had you said this in the post. But it's okay.
I'd just tell you not to be too biased, India is much much better in many counts than the writer's view. If you ever come to India again, drop me a message here, I'd like to show you the real India which isn't at all close to the article.
reply